Bristol City bosses: We'll tackle fears on new stadium
Parking and traffic congestion were key concerns raised by Long Ashton residents at the second exhibition on plans to develop a new 30,000-seater stadium for Bristol City.
The football club wants to build a new stadium on a former landfill site next to the David Lloyd sports centre, bordering Ashton Vale.
Several local residents said they thought the club had chosen the wrong site and a stadium would be better on the site next to Temple Meads Railway Station where a music arena had been proposed.
The South West Regional Development Agency turned down the arena plan last year and the site remains undeveloped.
BCFC chairman Steve Lansdown said: "If the Temple Meads site was not right for the arena it can't be right for a football stadium.
"The city council commissioned a study into potential sites for a football stadium in 2002. A number of sites were looked at and the conclusion was that Ashton Vale was the most suitable.
"It is right in our heartland and will not change the fabric of the area.
"I understand people's concerns about parking and there will be a considerable amount of parking at the stadium, though we will encourage people to come without their car.
"There's the park and ride and the rapid bus system will come into play.
"The residents of Long Ashton feel parking and congestion will be worse but we will try to alleviate that problem."
Mr Lansdown has already bought the site for a new stadium as part of a joint venture between his family and a construction firm but a master plan for the site will not be drawn up until local people have been consulted.
The club intends to put in planning applications to both Bristol City Council and North Somerset Council early next year.
The scheme straddles the border between the authorities, but planning consultants say the councils are working closely together on the project.
Ashton Gate, which has been the club's home for 100 years, only holds 20,000 spectators and City says it needs to expand.
It would cost £40 million to upgrade two of the existing stands at the current stadium.
If planning permission is granted the club would like to see the new stadium completed for the 2012-13 season.
The club has met with stiff opposition from members of the Ashton Vale Heritage Group who protested when bulldozers moved onto the field where the stadium is planned last month.
Group spokeswoman Sharon Dallin, said: "Ashton Vale Heritage Group is in regular contact with the Bristol City Council conservation department who have confirmed that an investigation into the activities on the site is ongoing.
"The group will be assisting the council in any way it can with its investigation.
"Because of the natural beauty of the area and the affection that residents have for it, many people have come forward and provided photographs and video footage recording the Ashton Vale fields over the last 50 years."
The group has organised a walk on November 15 at 1pm when people will walk along a public right of way on the land.
The group has also developed an e-petition calling for Bristol City Council to purchase Ashton Vale fields with the aim of developing a nature reserve.
People can give their views and ask questions at a final exhibition at the Premier Suite at Ashton Gate, from 10.30am to 5.30pm today (sat).













6 Comments
View all
by Ted, Bristol
Sunday, November 09 2008, 5:22PM
“Never mind the stadium,go and buy someone ( ANYONE )who can score goals.”
by dave, briz
Sunday, November 09 2008, 12:54PM
“i went to the southampton match, they have no parking in or around the ground, they have something like 500 bike racks at the ground and run shuttle buses from the train station and various park and ride sites from around the town. The club even attach a public transport discount stub to the tickets. It seemed to work there, so why not here.”
by johngalleysbudgie, yanley
Saturday, November 08 2008, 7:50PM
“On past experience this council will make its excuses and another chance of a decent facility in Bristol will be lost that is unless Mr Lansdown will build a cyclepath and make every supporter ride a bike to the venue.”
by MendipMan, Wurzel Country
Saturday, November 08 2008, 4:56PM
“When the Arena was proposed for the Temple Meads site many people said it was the wrong place because it was too close to the centre of the city and road access would be extremely difficult. Now we have people saying the football stadium (between three and four times bigger in capacity than the arena would have been) sited there. Anywhere but near me I suspect. There has been a lot of national comment in recent weeks as to how much the economies of the cities of Hull and Stoke (the newly promoted Premier teams this season) have benefited from having a top tier team. Bristol is bigger than both these places but is still rather sleepy when it comes to grasping the nettle with developments that are opposed by a minority of people. The ring road (wait, this is the Bristol area, that won't be built either) would take care of a lot of the traffic problems. Other areas see the wider picture but the Bristol area councils always have tunnel vision.”
by steve, clevedon
Saturday, November 08 2008, 1:54PM
“The increased car congestion and parking will always rear it's head in any major development whether it's a sporting or arts venue.It is no longer an excuse in itself the fact of the matter is that Bristol,whether it be it's council or some of it's residents has always been behind in supporting big events,or rather the siting of them in the area! That is why we still have two 1920's style football stadia and NO arts venue to support music events.It is true,Rovers had many alternative sites earmarked but time and again there was always an excuse why a stadium couldn't be built so they had no alternative but to apply to re-develop the Memorial Stadium,not an ideal site. There are far too many nimby's around Bristol and a concil that is far from ambitious!!!”