Battle lines drawn over inquiry into biofuel plant

Trusted article source icon
Monday, August 09, 2010
Profile image for This is Bristol

This is Bristol

A PUBLIC inquiry starts tomorrow into contro-versial plans to build a £70 million biofuel power station at Avonmouth.

Developers W4B Ltd claim the plant would only use sustainable energy to save on fossil fuels and carbon emissions.

But furious campaigners say liquid biofuels such as palm oil would be used which would have a devastating effect on the environment.

City councillors refused planning permission in February after they decided that ecological issues outweighed planning matters.

It was this decision which has triggered the inquiry.

The councillors had been advised by planning officers that the source of the fuel was not a "material planning matter" and therefore could not be taken into account when deciding whether to grant permission.

Before the inquiry gets under way, the planning inspector will hear legal arguments to decide whether campaigners will be allowed to present evidence on the impact of growing biofuels.

The inspector has already ruled against this but will hear legal arguments from campaigners that their evidence should be allowed.

Rob Palgrave from Biofuelwatch said: "The use of palm oil and other vegetable oils for energy is already exporting environmental problems on a large scale.

"If this power station goes ahead then it alone will double Britain's share of this destructive industry. An area of land at least one and a half times the size of Bristol would be needed to fuel it."

Mike Birkin of Friends of the Earth, said: "Sustainable renewable energy on a large scale must be captured directly from sun, wind and water – destroying rainforests to produce a small energy contribution is unacceptable and allowing renewables subsidies to be spent on this would be a travesty.

"The Government is expected to clarify its policy soon – in the mean time we need to ensure Bristol is not heading in the wrong direction."

Mr Birkin is referring to subsidies paid by the Government which would reward projects like the biofuel plant despite fears it would have such a devastating impact on the environment.

One of the campaigners, Mike Andrews, a retired film producer with the BBC's Natural History Unit, said: "Two thirds of the income for the plant will come from Government subsidies paid for by the electricity consumer – some £36m a year.

"Yet campaigners can show that, far from reducing greenhouse gases, burning palm oil releases more than burning fossil fuels, and the Department for Energy and Climate Change has published a report that says that burning Malaysian palm oil fuel is worse than burning natural gas."

Bristol North West MP Charlotte Leslie has already written to Energy Secretary Chris Huhne urging a change in planning laws so the global impact of biofuel schemes could be taken into account.

The developers said they would only use palm oil from sustainable sources and only as a temporary measure until they could be supplied with jatropha oil. Jatropha is a poisonous shrub which grows near the equator and which could be farmed on semi-arable land which would otherwise not be cultivated.

The plant would be built on part of the former Sevalco site off Severn Road and generate enough electricity to serve about 25,000 homes.

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Martin, Clifton

    Friday, August 13 2010, 3:38PM

    “I am against biofuels, wind turbines, nuclear fuel, solar energy, fossil fuel power stations etc, but still want electricity to run my computer, fridge, tv, hairdryer lights and everything else”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Julian, Bristol

    Wednesday, August 11 2010, 2:27AM

    “Hi Swiss, great you avoid the livestock impacts by not eating animal products, I do too, but using vegetable oil of any sort on this scale cannot be sustainable - it increases the market substantially and whatever way you look at it would require massive extra land use.

    The council is trying to be objective and supports wind and solar energy. 'Modern greens' (ie all main groups) generally support wind, solar and hydro schemes today, except in special cases where it threatens rare habitats. Even tropical biofuels are inefficient land use and cause disproportionate environmental destruction and climate change for the energy they capture. UK renewable resources can provide a large proportion of our requirements and we should join European HVDC grid to import solar electricity from further south too, along with using it more efficiently.

    Nuclear fusion will be great when it comes, but today's nuclear fission is expensive and timetaking to build, has inherent serious dangers, creates a very difficult long-term waste problem and uranium is getting scarcer and will run out soon anyway.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by david, Bristol

    Monday, August 09 2010, 8:48PM

    “Nuclear powerstations thats the way forward”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Swiss, Frome

    Monday, August 09 2010, 5:46PM

    “Wrong, its not the councils place to be subjective in planning decisions. Effectivly there are lots of ethical as well as unethical sources of palm oil. I know as I'm Vegan as its used in so many products its not funny, but its not hard to find ethical palm oil. There is no evidence apart from scare mongering on the councils part that the source of the fuel is non-ethical.

    I'm pretty sure that if we carry on stopping green energy production in this country because of every fool with a pen. Then were going to have a plethera of new Nuclear powerstations poping up.

    The 2 major wave farms I know of are both oposed by green actavists and a host of wind farms planned for the southwest are also oposed. Say how do we harvest green energy if nobody wants it ruining their surf or view?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Anon, Bristol

    Monday, August 09 2010, 3:56PM

    “No we dont”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Pogo the Clown, .

    Monday, August 09 2010, 3:48PM

    “"Biofuel plant"

    I see what you did there. I think this is a great idea. Surely we can expand the existing crematoria with power generation capabilities?”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by James, Bristol

    Monday, August 09 2010, 3:43PM

    “Yes we do, we want to keep the light on.”

  • Profile image for This is Bristol

    by Anon, Bristol

    Monday, August 09 2010, 1:42PM

    “We dont want it”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters