Baby died after Bristol hospital delay
A baby girl who died within days of being born in Bristol could have lived if her birth by Caesarean section was carried out sooner, an inquest heard.
Natasha Knowles was just four days old when she died at Southmead Hospital on February 11, 2005.
-
Southmead Hospital in Bristol
When she was born on February 7 she had no heartbeat and was not breathing.
Doctors put a tube into her airway to help her breathe and gave her heart massage, and after 35 minutes she was breathing and had a heartbeat.
But the stress on her tiny body left her in a coma.
A lack of oxygen to her brain severely damaged it, and she was also left with dramatic heart, kidney and liver problems.
At 9.30pm on February 11, after consultation with doctors, Natasha's parents Mark and Snezana Knowles, from Chipping Sodbury, took the agonising decision to turn her life support machine off.
Flax Bourton Coroners' Court heard Natasha died as a result of severe hypoxic brain damage, caused by lack of oxygen.
But there were also serious concerns about the management of Natasha's birth.
A decision to carry out a Caesarean section was made at 11am. But it was not performed until three-and-a-half hours afterwards.
In a statement read out in court, Philip Savage, a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at Southmead Hospital involved with her care, said: "The Caesarean section should have been carried out very soon after the decision to do it. The decision was made at 11am, and should have been carried out by noon, 12.30pm at the latest."
In response to a letter from Mr and Mrs Knowles, he said: "For a number of reasons there was an unacceptable delay in the Caesarean section. Delivery should have occurred in the latter part of the morning, and not deferred into the afternoon."
Yesterday's inquest heard that the Caesarean section was not re-categorised from "urgent" to "emergency" by doctors, and was therefore not regarded as being immediately threatening to either the mother or baby.
Sharon McKenna, a midwife and clinical risk manager for maternity at Southmead Hospital, said there had been a number of errors leading up to Natasha's birth.
She said there was a failure to recognise and act upon abnormalities found in a scan of Natasha's heart; a lack of clarity in the chain of command, as to which obstetrician was in charge of Mrs Knowles' care; inappropriate breaks in foetal monitoring; failure to adequately document scan descriptions; a failure to co-ordinate care within the midwifery team; and a failure to appreciate the significance of the whole clinical procedure.
The parents had a letter from North Bristol NHS Trust apologising for not delivering Natasha sooner. It has also carried out an internal investigation.
The inquest was then adjourned so that Doctor Savage could be called to give evidence in person.







5 Comments
by tarah, bristol
Saturday, December 04 2010, 2:47PM
“Although I have had 2 C sections at southmead with no problems my sister had a bad experience this year due to the medical team being reluctant to deliver her baby, she bled all through her pregnancy including 2 big hemorrhages where she was hopitalised and still they wouldn't take her baby out eventually when they decided to do a C section the baby was left without oxygen for so long she suffered brain trauma (caused by my sisters bleeds) and when she was delivered it took them 38 minutes to get oxygen into her as they were using the wrong sized tube , this was only realised when a senior member of staff came to assist she is now severely brain damaged it was totally avoidable had they performed the section earlier. We were told post delivery bya member of special care unit that every time my sister bled the baby was bleeding from the cord which caused the brain trauma.”
by hannah, bristol
Sunday, October 11 2009, 11:46PM
“first of all i would like to send my love and best wishes to the family of baby natasha, this is tragic and it could have been avoided, this is what i have noticed, when a woman goes into hospital to give birth the care they recieve has gotten a bit too relaxed, we know pregnancy is not an illness, but it just seems nowadays that the mums are just left alone when in labour to just get on with it so to speak, certainly from my experiences anyway, i had two children 10 years apart from each other, both at the same hospital and i noticed the difference of level of care, but this can be down to many factors,maybe procedures have changed but i also know that when its your 2nd 3rd babies they tend not to be so full on as they do with first babies i am in no way trying to play this down by speaking about my own experiences but i do feel that with my second child, the care was somewhat different than that which was given to my first childs delivery.in a nutshell i noticed the difference and i did think at the time things were a little too assuming from the medics point of view.”
by louise, bristol
Sunday, October 11 2009, 6:03PM
“i had a horrendous birth at southmead hospital i think the staff are too streched and under too much pressure to give the care and attentionm that is needed my thoughts go out to the poor family of natasha”
by Toni, Bristol
Saturday, October 10 2009, 9:30PM
“Heartbreaking, my thoughts are with the parents and family...”
by Count of Monte Cristo, Ashtonia
Saturday, October 10 2009, 10:40AM
“would you please have the guts to put my comments on”