Anger as trees felled for new housing scheme

Trusted article source icon
Friday, February 03, 2012
Profile image for The Post

The Post

RESIDENTS living in a Speedwell tower block in Speedwell are furious after council contractors chopped down two mature trees from their communal garden to make way for a housing development.

They claim Bristol City Council promised the trees would be left alone and say they have already been put through enough after building works started in the summer.

But the council denies that the trees were ring-fenced and points out that 29 new trees will be planted as part of the scheme.

Twenty-two new homes are currently being built by Sovereign Housing Association on open space in the grounds of Roegate House, an 11-storey high-rise block of flats housing people over 50.

The scheme was given planning consent in 2009 despite resistance from nearby residents who believed it would cause traffic congestion and affect wildlife in the area.

The site for the new homes, which lies between Speedwell Road and Whitefield Avenue, is owned by the city council.

Retired publicans Jennifer Payne, 55, and her husband Chris, 56, were shocked when they looked out of their window on the block's third floor and saw the trees being chopped down.

"We didn't want the development in the first place but in the end we accepted it was going to happen," said Mrs Payne.

"There was a consultation and we were told that the five trees behind our building would not be touched.

"The council assured us of that, so we were flabbergasted to look out of our window and see two being taken down. It is such a shame because they are so beautiful and there's a lot of wildlife around them.

"We feel quite deceived."

Mrs Payne said that residents had already been put through enough since building works started in the summer, including noisy building works, builders' vehicles taking over their car park, and contractors coming and going, and that this was the last straw.

Another retired resident, Doreen Saunders, 79, who has lived in the building for the last 15 years, said: "The trees have been here as long as this block – around 40 years – and they are hugely valued by residents.

"They are mature trees and are lovely to look at from our building.

"It's just unbelievable that they're being taken away.

"It's so sad because they should have been left alone."

The housing association is building 12 homes fronting onto Speedwell Road and one four-bed home fronting onto Whitefield Avenue.

It also plans to build two terraces – one of four homes and another with five homes – where garages on the north of the site used to stand before they were demolished.

A city council spokesman said: "We can confirm that the two trees that were felled were always due to be removed, one of them due to poor health. However, a further 29 trees are due to be planted on the land, so there will be a large net gain."

A spokesman for Sovereign Housing Association said: "Sovereign has worked with Bristol City Council and our construction partners to protect the trees on this site as much as possible. The arboricultural report approved as part of the planning application identified that as many trees as possible on this site would be retained, and these have been protected during construction work.

"However, the planning permission for this site also approved the removal of two trees within the communal gardens of Roegate House, which was necessary to accommodate the new road.

"Sovereign takes its commitment to sustainable development very seriously and as part of the approved landscaping strategy for this site, we identified that we would replant 29 new trees within the overall development in lieu of the trees that needed to be removed.

"This landscaping with native species will attract wildlife into the area and make Roegate House an appealing place to live."

11
Tweet this article
Report

11 Comments

  • Profile image for 911InsideJob

    by 911InsideJob

    Monday, February 06 2012, 12:20PM

    “Dissembling is the order of the day, yes people need somewhere to live, but when you are stacked up in high density blocks like rats in a cage you need gardens and green views to retain your sanity - this was obviously understood by the planners of high rise complexes. The Council took away tenants and leaseholders garages at Roegate on the premise that there was anti-social behavior there as an excuse to build these houses - these were decent brick built garages. They also took away a large swayth of the front garden area, deemed on planning maps a childrens play area! This was from the same LibDem proposed garage project that was only supposed to look at developing run down disused garages! The original Roegate House gardens were tidy and landscaped well. The council have also called this a block for the over 50s, although they can't guarantee to fill it this way, so no play area for future children who live here. The Council also gave a £3million pound 'enabling grant' to Sovereign RSL the developers of the 22 houses being built on Roegates gardens, out of the rent account, so tenants rents have gone to pay for the removal of their green spaces and an increase in housing density on a already high density site (80 flats approx)! Who's interests are the council and LibDems really working in? Council flats usually have fractured vulnerable communities and are easy to pick on, when we have brown field sites that are derelict and the council choose to build on tenants gardens it is a sad day! The planning committee that allowed this travesty to go ahead included LibDem Councillor and BCC tenant Cheryl Ann who voted for this - Cheryl Ann lives in a Semi detached council house near to the green space of Horfield Common with a large garden. She is also proposing to take housing from the Council with a Tenant Management Organisation called Spirit Homes which she helped setup, and of which the LibDems have fully supported, this is even though she is a councillor and it is a clash of interests. The LibDems will become more unpopular in this city than Thatcher!”

  • Profile image for Stokeygee

    by Stokeygee

    Friday, February 03 2012, 10:14PM

    “nigels learnt a new word, NIMBY.

    He loves to use it.”

  • Profile image for Meetwee

    by Meetwee

    Friday, February 03 2012, 9:04PM

    “Ooohhh, Stop the press! 29 trees to be planted!!! All the current residents will have been brown bread for years by the time that lot are mature, mind you there's no guarantee that the council will actually do what they say they will. 29 trees will take up a lot of space, could build even more houses if they didn't plant 'em...”

  • Profile image for nljack

    by nljack

    Friday, February 03 2012, 5:09PM

    “NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY

    Its a few tree's.... get over it, you guys should get out more.

    Some people in the world dont have anywhere to live and are starving.

    Tut Tut”

  • Profile image for frank1958

    by frank1958

    Friday, February 03 2012, 4:33PM

    “If you wanted to cut down atree in your back garden the council would deny permission.”

  • Profile image for Kyngsmeadboy

    by Kyngsmeadboy

    Friday, February 03 2012, 4:04PM

    “Perhaps Bonsai trees in window boxes could be the solution.”

  • Profile image for bobob3

    by bobob3

    Friday, February 03 2012, 12:36PM

    “Its understandable how they feel, a bit of nature when your in a tower block goes a long way, plus you get used to watching trees change through the seasons.”

  • Profile image for joning

    by joning

    Friday, February 03 2012, 12:14PM

    “''RESIDENTS living in a Speedwell tower block in Speedwell...''

    Idiotic. Did the work experience kid finally get his shot?”

  • Profile image for SpinyHedgehog

    by SpinyHedgehog

    Friday, February 03 2012, 12:10PM

    “"But the council denies that the trees were ring-fenced and points out that 29 new trees will be planted as part of the scheme."

    Well, that'll be useful if Doreen Saunders lives to be 119...

    Just what DOES this Council have against trees?”

  • Profile image for Pogo_T_Clown

    by Pogo_T_Clown

    Friday, February 03 2012, 12:05PM

    “Ooh, look at their angry faces! What a great photo! Ha ha ha ha haaaa! :D”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters