BREAKING NEWS
 

Alarm company ordered to pay £30 million in damages to owners of Weston-super-Mare Grand Pier

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, January 02, 2013
Profile image for H_Pickstock

H_Pickstock

AN alarm company has been ordered to pay £30 million in damages to the owners of Weston-super-Mare's Grand Pier following the fire which destroyed the seafront landmark.

His Honour Judge Havelock-Allan, sitting at Bristol Mercantile Court found 'a high degree of negligence' against alarm company System 2 Security, following the Grand Pier fire in July 2008.

  1. Heartbreaking. The fire which destroyed Weston-super-Mare's Grand Pier in July 2008.

    Heartbreaking: The fire which destroyed Weston-super-Mare's Grand Pier in July 2008.

Sitting at the Bristol Mercantile Court, Judge Havelock-Allan said that if the alarm company had done its job, the Grand Pier would have been saved from the fire that completely destroyed the pavilion.

He found 'no contributory negligence' on behalf of the Grand Pier Limited (GPL) - said 100 % blame was with the alarm company and awarded an immediate payment of £30 million plus interest to GPL.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013

However, System 2 Security of Locking Road in Weston-super-Mare went into administration three days before the court case began in November, raising questions about whether GPL will receive any money.

The fire broke out on the landmark during the early hours of July 28 and at first was contained in buildings at the end of the pier.

A member of the public saw smoke and called the fire brigade at about 6.45am, but by then it was too late and the fire could not be contained.

System 2 Security was engaged by the Grand Pier to maintain and monitor the alarm system.

Grand Pier owners, Kerry and Michelle Michael, served papers on the company claiming that the fire alarm went off at the seafront landmark at 1.35am yet no 999 calls were made until 7am.

Mr Michael said he was pleased with the complete vindication of GPL, its directors and staff but that he was determined to pursue those responsible.

Mr Michael said: "There can be no doubt where the blame lies.

"It has cost us hundreds of thousands of pounds to pursue this judgement and we did so knowing that System 2 Security Limited was just a shell of a company with little or no assets so we had little chance of seeing any compensation from them.

"However, we felt we had a duty to get to the truth behind the fire and identify those responsible for the loss of the Grand Pier.

"We will continue to pursue the company, its directors, insurers and anyone else that provided advice to System 2 Security before or since the fire.

"They were clearly responsible for what happened yet they continued to deny any liability until the court case was upon them when they put the company into administration."

The news comes just months after GPL received an out of court settlement for an undisclosed amount from the Essex-based alarm company Yeoman Monitoring Services Ltd.

System 2 Security, which was based at Locking Road, Weston-super-Mare, contracted out the job of monitoring the alarm system to Yeoman Monitoring Services.

At the time of the fire, the pier owners claimed the alarm was remotely suspended multiple times by Yeoman Monitoring Service for up to four hours at a time.

The Michaels maintained that the fire which destroyed the attraction may not have resulted in such a devastating loss if the emergency services had been called when the remote alarm was first activated at 1.35am.

The pavilion was re-built at a cost of £51 million and re-opened for business in October 2011 and now welcomes 3.5 million visitors each year.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for phantom1974

    by phantom1974

    Thursday, January 03 2013, 8:32AM

    “I am confused, how does this solve how the fire started ?”

  • Profile image for Oldfrank

    by Oldfrank

    Wednesday, January 02 2013, 11:33PM

    “Did they know System 2 Security "was just a shell of a company with little or no assets" when they gave them the contract ?

    Or didn't they worry about that if the price was right ?

    Did they really feel "they had a duty to "get to the truth behind the fire"

    Or did their insurance company insist they did so ?

    All seems a bit of a farce to me but no doubt the reason behind it is someone covering their backside.”

  • Profile image for lolly60

    by lolly60

    Wednesday, January 02 2013, 10:47PM

    “Always thought it was the owners that did it for the insurance and the chance to build a new pier.”

  • Profile image for bokbok

    by bokbok

    Wednesday, January 02 2013, 2:12PM

    “It was worth it then. ;)”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article