20mph limits all round by 2015
A BLANKET 20mph speed limit on all of Bristol’s residential streets will be in place by 2015.
Cabinet councillors last nightTHU voted to spend £2.3 million on introducing the new lower limit in stages.
-

The Bristol City Council Cabinet
Bristol will be one of the first cities in the country to bring in the reduced limit on all but the busiest roads. It follows trials in two pilot areas in the south and east of the city, which have been hailed a success.
The combined area of the two trial projects – one covering Bedminster, Southville and Windmill Hill and the other covering St Paul’s, Easton, Eastville, Redfield and St George – included 500 roads and 30,000 households.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
Now that the proposals have been approved, the 14 neighbourhood partnership groups in Bristol will be consulted on appropriate signage for their area.
Discussions will be held with the city’s 14 neighbourhood partnerships with a view to introducing 20mph limits on some main roads around shops, schools and parks where there is currently a 30mph limit.
Dual carriageways and other existing 40mph and 50mph limit roads will not be affected.
The first phase of the new limits will link the two pilot areas with the city centre.
The new limits will then spread outwards into the more central suburbs, and then beyond.
Tim Kent, the council’s cabinet member for transport, introduced a report on the scheme at last night’s meeting.
“From the two pilot areas it’s very clear that the new limit has had a real benefit on cycling, pedestrian usage of the roads, and children playing out more in the streets,” he said.
“We all love our cars but we must be able to accept that things are different – this is about trying to reclaim our streets.
“Walking, cycling shopping and playing out all become easier and happier experiences when traffic is moving at a moderate speed.
“Both our pilots demonstrated popular support and clear community benefits, with happier children playing out more, quieter streets and a more welcoming shopping environment. So it’s got to be a green light for a city-wide proposal.”
Mr Kent pointed out that money to fund the scheme is coming from a Government grant rather than tax payers.
The 20mph speed limit is supported by NHS Bristol, which was instrumental in introducing the 20mph limit to pilot areas.
Hugh Annett, Bristol’s director of public health, said: “The 20mph limit is something that not only improves health and wellbeing, it makes our streets safer and more accessible for those who want to walk, cycle or play.”
Martin McDonnell, secretary of Bristol Cycling Campaign, had written to the council to support the roll-out of a 20mph limit on the city’s residential roads.
“Bristol Cycling Campaign would like to add our support to the proposal to roll out 20mph city-wide.
“The campaign has been pushing for 20mph since it was founded over 20 years ago and it had remained one of our key objectives in order to make this a better city for cycling and in general a better place to live.
“We see 20mph as fundamental in making Bristol a greener, more sustainable and attractive place to live in keeping with our goal for Bristol and the surrounding area to be alive with people on bicycles; where cycling is so easy everyone does it and it is happier, healthier, greener and more civilised.”
The Post asked Bristol's would-be mayors what they thought about plans for 20mph limits. Here's what they had to say:
Marvin Rees, who is the Labour Party’s candidate for mayor, is backing the changes to speed limits.
He said: “I think it is a good idea but the challenge is going to be enforcement. We want streets where our children can go out and play.
“It is about liveability, making Bristol a place where you can walk along the streets. And if it is safer and more friendly for people it would be a really good thing.”
Green candidate Daniella Radice is also backing the changes to the speed limit. She said: “I wholeheartedly support the 20mph speed limit initiative.
“As well as saving lives, the 20mph limit will make our streets a safer place for children to play and encourage communities to use these spaces more freely.
“It will also cut noise pollution and improve the city’s air quality. The policy is common sense and we should have done it years ago.”
Independent candidate George Ferguson said: “We have had speed limits in Bedminster where I live already and they have been a success. When they were first introduced people were really opposed to the idea but they have come to accept them. Not only has it made the place safer, I honestly don’t think it has made it harder to get around. I have not noticed my journeys taking longer since the introduction of the new speed limits.”
Eric Mutch, who is standing as Mr Corrupt Self-serving Lying B’stard, said: “It seems to be a bit of a no-brainer for me. From what I’ve read, the reason it is being brought in is because if you are driving at 30mph you can kill a child but at 20mph you will not kill a child so you are saving a life.
“I don’t drive myself so I don’t know what it feels like to drive a safe speed limit for a residential area but I would have thought if there has been any sort of research that says 30mph would kill a child but at 20mph there would be a better chance of survival, I would go for 20mph. I would back it.”
Respect party mayoral candidate Paulette North said: “I think it’s very simple really, I would support any measures that would reduce injuries and death on our roads.
“Having gone to a speed workshop for speeding I have seen the videos of what the effects would be at 20mph, 30mph, 40mph and 50mph on someone being hit. The videos are absolutely horrific, so if it’s a difference between somebody being hit and injured and dying on our roads and somebody being safe I think I would support a 20mph limit, especially in areas where there is a high density of young families and the elderly as well – the amount of times I have seen elderly people crossing roads and cars whizzing by and I think we all ought to be a bit more responsible.”
The other declared candidates Craig Clarke, Andy Thorne, Spud Murphy and Tim Collins were unavailable for comment.




Comments
by Stephen_L
Saturday, December 01 2012, 1:00PM
“It must be rigorously enforced, or there's no point. This way, it could easily be self-financing.
And it must apply to all vehicles.
http://tinyurl.com/c8wo6nk
It makes no difference if you're hit by a speeding private or police car at 30mph.”
by kate345
Tuesday, October 02 2012, 2:33PM
“You can't go faster than 20 on most of the residential areas anyway because of the parked cars. So instead of reducing speed limits they should sort out major traffic issues in this city first, like sorting out the cyclists on the roads and their lack of knowledge of traffic rules as they are the real danger, put clear markings on the lanes so drivers know which lane goes where especially on the roundabouts so there will be less annoying accidents, and most of all they should synchronize green lights in this city to improve traffic flow, seriously some idiot is planning those lights, we are just driving from red to red which is ridiculously stupid and slows whole traffic down a lot! Where our money from council tax and road tax are going to?”
by DM_Fishponds
Monday, August 13 2012, 6:42PM
“I realize that there will be few LibDems and their supporters reading 'The Sun', so here is the headline and web link to last Fridays story.
"Official: Casualties soaring in 20mph zones" - http://tinyurl.com/clrwyhr
The following extract sums-up the problem quite nicely!
"Experts say motorists don't concentrate and become frustrated in 20mph zones — and pedestrians are lulled into a false sense of security. In Portsmouth, a blanket 20mph limit on built-up roads was introduced five years ago. The number killed or seriously injured in the city rocketed from 79 in 2007 to 143 last year."”
by fanta00
Friday, August 03 2012, 10:40AM
“Are they f****g crazy?!? Let's limit all roads to 5mph so everyone will be actually better off walking!
Yes traffic is difficult in Bristol, but making it all worse for drivers doesn't improve anything and those that do not want to travel by buses, won't do it even when forced to do that, so Council - instead of focusing on how to ban all drivers, work on improving roads and traffic!!!”
by crunch_combo
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 1:21PM
“"From the two pilot areas it's very clear that the new limit has had a real benefit on cycling, pedestrian usage of the roads, and children playing out more in the streets," he said.
So who actually is keeping tabs on the cyclists who go more than 20mph? and the cyclists who are always going through red lights? and the cyclists who have no lights or helmets or who ride on the pavements?
Answers on a postcard to Tim Kent and our local Police force
Thank you all”
by JonSwansea86
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 1:00PM
“The people in the photo aren't representitive of my age group.
Aren't representitve of my life.
Why didn't I get asked if I wanted this to happen.
Why not take all the fun out of life and ban everything else while you're at it.”
by GrumbleDuke
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 12:08PM
“@smoosername
I still don''t understand how my statement of observed facts can be called subjective but you are entitled to your own opinion.”
by smoosername
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 11:43AM
“sub·jec·tive - adjective
(1) placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc... unduly egocentric.
I'm not saying your observations aren't true. I'm not saying they exist entirely in your mind.
I'm saying after complaining a report was subjective... you gave a very subjective example.”
by GrumbleDuke
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 11:30AM
“@smoosername
You make a few assumptions but it is basically an observable fact not something that exists solely in my mind, so it is not subjective. There is nothing to stop you making the same observations as me, just find a 20 mph stretch of road and have a go. I suggest Church Road in Redfield heading into Lawrence Hill.”
by smoosername
Tuesday, July 31 2012, 11:21AM
“@GrumbleDuke
So one persons view, in one city, in one area of that city, on one route, in one form of transport and at one time of the day is not subjective? Really?”